Teacher Practical Guidance:
Decreasing Disruptive Behavior
Category: Strategy
Rank Order
Effect Size
Achievement Gain %
How-To Strategies
BENEFITS
- Disruptive behavior can consume a large share of class time.
- When interventions reduce disruptions, time-on-task and academic engagement increase, and schools often see gains in test scores, work completion, and graduation-related indicators.
- Calmer classrooms support higher grades and better concentration.
- Chronic disruption and perceived chaos increase stress, anxiety, and feelings of un safety among students.
- Frequent disruptive behavior is a major source of teacher stress, burnout, and attrition, with teachers. link
KEY CAUSES
Disruptive student behaviors usually arise from a mix of individual, family, and school/classroom factors rather than a single cause.
- Family stressors such as poverty, harsh or inconsistent parenting, and chaotic or conflict-filled homes are strongly linked to early and persistent disruptive behavior patterns at school.
- Students may act out to communicate unmet needs (e.g., anxiety, boredom, confusion, sensory overload, or social isolation).
- Weak emotional regulation and social skills, including difficulty coping with transitions, criticism, or peer conflict, frequently underlie behaviors.
- Learning difficulties (e.g., inability to read grade-level text, unaddressed gaps) can push students toward avoidance, clowning, or defiance as self-protection.
- Over reliance of boring classroom instruction (worksheets and teacher lecture.
- Poor classroom organization—unclear expectations, inconsistent routines, inadequate materials, or noisy, cluttered environments—accounts for a large proportion of low-level disruption.
- Instruction that is disorganized, overly teacher-centered, or heavily punitive (e.g., frequent reactive consequences without proactive teaching of expectations) can unintentionally maintain or escalate misbehavior. link
HOW TO
- Set clear expectations early
- Establish classroom norms and policies at the beginning of the course
- Include behavioral expectations in the syllabus and review them with students
- Use preventive measures
- Greet students at the door to set a positive tone
- Optimize seating arrangements to minimize disruptions
- Change activities frequently to maintain engagement
- Give breaks to allow students to reset their attention
- Address issues promptly and consistently
- Respond to disruptive behavior immediately before patterns develop
- Be consistent in enforcing consequences
- Use proximity and non-verbal cues
- Move closer to disruptive students
- Make eye contact or use gestures to redirect behavior
- Speak privately with disruptive students
- Meet one-on-one during office hours to discuss concerns
- Focus on the specific problematic behaviors, not personal criticisms
6.. Employ de-escalation techniques
- Acknowledge feelings while setting clear limits
- Use a respectful, non-confrontational tone
7. Document incidents
- Keep records of disruptive behaviors and your responses
- Share information with Administration if issues persist
8. Adjust teaching – recognize that teacher behavior and practices may be a causal factor
- Implement more active learning, group work or interactive activities
- Focus on ways to improve engagement
- Strive to implement more self-regulated learning, choices, and cooperative learning
- Engage in self-reflection
- Build teacher trust and focus on teacher clarity
- Seek feedback to improve engagement
9. Know when to seek additional help. link
Effect-Size Impact of Various Strategies
1. Teacher “with-it-ness” (1.42 effect size)
2. Social or token reinforcement (1.38)
3. Behavior consultation with Social Worker or Counselor (1.09)
4. Cooperation training for students (1.05)
5. Disciplinary interventions (0.91 effect size)
6. Establishing group goals (0.90 effect size)
7. Recognition and encouragement (Intrinsic Motivation) – (0.82 effect size)
8. Positive student/teacher relationship (0.80 effect size)
9. Clear rules and procedures (0.76 effect size)
10. Establish classroom community and cohesion (0.66 effect size)
11. Consequences (0.51 effect size)
12. Student social skills training (0.44). Skiba & Casey (1985), Hattie (2023)
Ways to Establish Classroom Cohesion & Community
1. Class is perceived to be safe and fair for all students
2. Inviting for students to learn
3. Positive teacher / student and student / student relationships
4. Co-and-peer learning opportunities
5. Welcoming of errors and “problems are OK” … we will learn how to fix things
6. Regular feedback
7. Creation of goals and success criteria with students. Mullen (1994)
Positive Teacher Skills
- Can the teacher release responsibility more often and help students set goals?
- Can the teacher “see the world” through a students’ eyes?
- Can the teacher show flexibility with their teaching style and differentiate instruction?
- Can the teacher recognize the students’ strengths and utilize them when providing support?
- Can the teacher learn along side the students. Cornelius-White (2007)
CHALLENGES
Many teachers struggle with disruptive behavior because they receive limited preparation in behavior management, face rising intensity of student needs, and must implement strategies under high stress with little systemic support.
- Little or no explicit training in classroom management.
- Teachers commonly encounter higher rates of trauma, mental health concerns, developmental disorders, and severe externalizing behavior, which go well beyond what traditional “rules and consequences” can address.
- Minimal access to specialists or intensive supports.
- Weak or inconsistent schoolwide behavior systems (unclear policies, uneven consequences, limited follow-up) leave teachers feeling they are “on their own”
- High stress, frustration, or emotional exhaustion makes it harder to stay calm, consistent, and reflective, which are essential to implementing positive behavior strategies effectively.
- Teachers rarely examine their own attitudes, beliefs and practices which may be contributing to classroom disruptions. It is easiest to think that the students are at fault. link
WHAT NOT TO DO
- Don’t get into power struggles, arguments, or shouting matches; these escalate hostility.
- Don’t reprimand constantly or call students out publicly for every minor disruption; heavy negative attention often increases misbehavior.
- Don’t use ridicule, sarcasm, or public humiliation (e.g., “time-out corners” as punishment).
- Don’t respond only to surface behavior without asking why it’s happening (attention, escape, confusion, boredom, stress).
- Don’t assume “they know how to behave” and treat misbehavior as pure willfulness; if you haven’t explicitly taught and practiced the behavior, it’s unreasonable to expect it.
- Don’t take misbehavior so personally that you lose objectivity.
- Don’t keep “trying harder negatively” (more yelling, more consequences, more removed privileges) when a strategy isn’t working.
- Don’t lean on suspensions, office referrals, or sending students out as your main tools; these rarely teach replacement behaviors.
- Don’t give most of your attention, time, and emotion to the most disruptive students while largely ignoring their appropriate behavior.
- Don’t make the disruption a whole-class spectacle.
- Don’t focus only on rules and compliance while neglecting relationships, autonomy, and belonging.
- Don’t ignore prevention—boring, unstructured time, confusing tasks, and lack of routines. link
How-To Resources
ARTICLE
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Strategies for managing challenging behavior
Link – ARTICLE (UKan.) Behavior Plans
Link – ARTICLE (MI Dept. of ED) Introduction to PBIS
Link – ARTICLE (AKohn) Alternative view of discipline
Link – ARTICLE (EducWeek) Trauma response
Link – ARTICLE (EducWeek) Universal Prevention Measure
Link – ARTICLE (ChildMind) What is a Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP)
Link – ARTICLE (EducWeek) 8 tips for problem students
Link – ARTICLE (LDOnline) Behavior Modification in the Classroom
Link – ARTICLE (EducWeek) Restorative discipline
Link – ARTICLE (FBA) Functional Behavioral Assessment
Link – ARTICLE (ASCD) Teachers feeling unsupported
Link – ARTICLE (ASCD) Avoiding common classroom management missteps
Link – ARTICLE (EducWeek) The Power of Student-Teacher Relationships
Link – ARTICLE (ReThinkED) Teachers not prepared
Link – ARTICLE (Autism) What works and doesn’t work
GUIDE / REPORT
Link – GUIDE (Hanover Research Brief) Restorative Practice Guide
Link – GUIDE (WWC, 2008) Reducing behavior problems
Link – GUIDE (WWC, 2023) Intervention Teams
Link – GUIDE (Hanover Research Brief) SEL
Link – REPORT (WWC) Classroom Management w/Aggressive Students: k-3
Link – REPORT (WWC) Caring School Curriculum: K-6
Link – REPORT (WWC) First Steps to Success: K-3 Aggressive Children
Link – REPORT (WWC) Positive Action: K-12
Link – REPORT (Blueprints) “ABC Project”
Link – REPORT (WWC) Coping Power: MS grades
RESEARCH
Link – RESEARCH (NIH) Good behavior game
Link – RESEARCH (NIH) Child disruptive behavior and family linkages
Link – RESEARCH (ERIC) Evidence based classroom behavior strategies
Link – RESEARCH (NIH) Barriers to effective classroom behavior interventions
Link – RESEARCH (FS) Using differential reinforcement to manage disruptive behaviors
BOOK
Link – BOOK (A. Kohn) Beyond discipline
PROGRAMS
Link – WEBSITE (EBI) Generalized Student Behaviors
Link – WEBSITE (RC) Responsive Curriculum
Link – WEBSITE (Conflict Center) Restorative Discipline
Link – WEBSITE (IIRP) Restorative Practices
Link – WEBSITE (LL) Love & Logic
Link – WEBSITE (EBI) Classwide Student Behavior Strategies
Link – WEBSITE (Center on PBIS) PBIS Guide & resources
Link – WEBSITE (Flippen) Capturing Kids Hearts
Link – PROGRAM (WWC) Caring school curriculum
Link – PROGRAM (WWC) Coping power
Link – PROGRAM (WWC) Positive action
Link – PROGRAM (WWC) 1st steps to success
VIDEO
Link – VIDEO (Educ Week) Harness the Power of Relationships
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Top 10 Classroom management tips
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Getting discipline right – D. Reeves
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Research based classroom management
DIGITAL
- ClassDojo – behavior monitoring platform link
- PBIS rewards – rewards monitoring platform link
- ClassroomScreen – timer & noise indicator link
References
Abramowitz AJ, O’Leary SG, Futtersak MW. (1988). The relative impact of long and short reprimands on children’s off-task behavior in the classroom. Behavior Therapy. 19(2):243–247.
Bambara LM, Nonnemacher S, Kern L. (2009). Sustaining school-based individualized positive behavior support: Perceived barriers and enablers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 11(3):161–176.
Center on PBIS. website link
Collier-Meek MA, Sanetti LMH, Boyle AM. (2019). Barriers to implementing classroom management and behavior support plans: An exploratory investigation. Psychology in the Schools. 56(1):5–17.
Cornelius-White (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 77. 113-143
Domitrovich C., et. al. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion. 1(3):6–28.
Ewe LP. (2019). ADHD symptoms and the teacher–student relationship: A systematic literature review. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 24(2):136–155
IES What Works Clearinghouse (2020) Classroom Management Training: Aggressive Children. Link
Flippen. Capturing Kids Hearts.Link
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The sequel. Routledge.
Martinussen R, Tannock R, Chaban P. (2011). Teachers’ reported use of instructional and behavior management practices for students with behavior problems: Relationship to role and level of training in ADHD. Child and Youth Care Forum.40(3):193–210.
Marzano, R. (2000) What works in classroom instruction. ERIC. ED 468 434
Marzano, R. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research based strategies for every teacher. ASCD.
Mullen & Cooper. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance. Psychological Bulletin. 115(2). 210-227
Perplexity (2024). *Perplexity.ai* (AI chatbot). https://www.perplexity.ai/
Poulou M, Norwich B. (2002). Cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses to students with emotional and behavioural difficulties: A model of decision-making. British Educational Research Journal. 28(1):111–138.
Shernoff ES, Lekwa AL, Reddy LA, Davis (2020). Teachers’ use and beliefs about praise: A mixed-methods study. School Psychology Review. 49(3):256–274
Skiba & Casey (1985). Interventions for the behaviorally disordered student: A quantitative review. Behavioral Disorders. 10(4), 239-254.
Skiba, Casey, & Center (1985) Nonaversive procedures in the treatment of classroom behavior problems. Journal of Special Education.
Stage & Quiroz. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behaviors in public school. School Psychology Review, 26(3). 333-368.
Sugai G, Horner RR. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review. 35(2):245–259.
University of Missouri. Evidence Based Intervention Network (EBI). Link
Decreasing Disruptive Behavior
DEFINITIONS
Disruptive Behavior: inappropriate behavior that interferes with the functioning and flow of the classroom, hindering or preventing faculty from carrying out their professional responsibilities and impeding students’ ability to learn. Disruptions by students often aimed to exert a negative influence on the greater classroom environment. Generally caused by a greater factor than just acting out. Can stem from boredom, lack of attention, the task being too challenging, the student not feeling heard, etc. link
Behavior Improvement: refers to the process of implementing strategies to help students develop positive behaviors that enhance their learning experience. Changing student behavior is complex. Many parts of the system, classroom, student background, social impacts, unique behavior characteristics, relationships, social & emotional skills and teacher interventions are in play. Typical behavior management interventions typically focus on changing the student (80%) with much less emphasis on providing teachers with greater student insight, strategies, or improved teacher/student relationship (15%). These are the forgotten ingredients of behavior management which should be enhanced.
DATA
-
6 Meta analysis reviews
-
319 Research studies
-
22,187 Ttudents in research studies
-
3 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p.183
QUOTES
“The presence of disruptive students can have a negative effect on their own and all other students’ achievement outcomes. Reducing disruptive behavior must be a core competency of any successful teacher.” Marzano (2000)
“Effective classroom management means establishing a positive climate, good relations among students and with teacher, a sense of fairness and invitation to learn, and appropriate interventions…but it does not mean a quiet classroom and compliant focused learning environment.” Hattie (2023) p. 194
“With-it-ness is the teachers skill in knowing what is going on in their classrooms by having eyes-in-the-back-of-their-heads. Marzano (2000) notes this attribute has a great impact on ensuring a well-managed classroom and reducing disruptions.” Hattie (2023) p. 90
“The key ingredients to improved behavior in the classroom includes: setting clear expectations and routines; creating positive relations with and among students; seeing the problem as difficult behaviors not difficult students; ensuring there is the right level of challenge in tasks to engage learners to avoid resistance; and having the ability to act quickly on potential behavioral problems.” Hattie (2023) p. 195
“If children by age 8 do not feel they are successfully part of the school culture, their expectations diminish dramatically.” Hattie (2023) p. 68
What you permit you promote
I’m sorry – is a statement; I won’t do it again – is a promise; How do I make it up to you – is responsibility
“The only classroom rules that matter are the ones that are actually enforced. Students quickly realize when the rules are stated but not enforced. Adult behavior is no different. In the absence of staff collective commitments and the willingness to hold each other accountable, schools struggle with building a collaborative culture because of personal conflict and adult drama. Student learning suffers because the adults are unable to establish truly professional relationships.” Dufor (2015) p.113
