Teacher Practical Guidance:

Jigsaw Method

Category: Strategy

Rank Order

11

Effect Size

0.93

Achievement Gain %

32

How-To Strategies

BENEFITS


  • Promotes deeper understanding because students must first learn material well enough to teach it and then integrate all “expert pieces” into a coherent whole.

 

  • Increases achievement and long-term retention.

 

  • Breaks complex topics into manageable parts.

 

  • Encourages active learning: students ask more questions, participate more, and rely less on the teacher.

 

  • Builds a sense of autonomy and competence because each student becomes an “expert”

 

  • Improves peer relations, empathy, and respect.

 

  • Provides an efficient way to cover large amounts of content while keeping students engaged. link

 

 

 

HOW TO


 

1.Divide students into 5-or-6 person groups.

 

2.Appoint one student from each group to be leader.

 

3. Divide the lesson into 5 or six segments.

 

4. Assign one segment to each student.

 

5. Give each student time to read and learn about their segment.

 

6. Form temporary expert groups, assigning each student with the same segment to “expert group” to prepare presentation.

 

7. Bring students back into original groups.

 

8. Each student makes a presentation about their segment to the group who ask questions and seek clarification.

 

9. Teacher floats from group to group observing and supporting each group.

 

10. At the end, do a formative assessment or quiz on the material. Aronson (2000),  Link

 

 

CHALLENGES


  • Designing good jigsaw tasks requires careful division of content, creation of balanced materials, and planning for grouping, transitions, and assessment.

 

  • In-class time is often longer than for a straightforward lecture, as students need time to learn their segment, meet as experts, and then teach their home group.

 

  • Some students may dominate while others stay quiet, leading to uneven preparation and gaps in group learning if an “expert” has not mastered their part.

 

  • Lack of accountability can result in superficial peer explanations and misconceptions being passed around if the teacher is not monitoring and checking understanding.

 

  • Mixed ability levels make text selection and scaffolding crucial; without supports, struggling students may feel overwhelmed by their expert role.  link

 

 

 

SOLVING JIGSAW CHALLENGES


  • Provide structured roles (facilitator, timekeeper, recorder, presenter) and clear norms to balance participation.

 

  • Use leveled texts, guiding.questions, and graphic organizers to scaffold expert learning, especially for students who need more support.

 

  • Build in individual accountability with brief quizzes, exit tickets, or individual products alongside group tasks.

 

  • Start with short, low-stakes jigsaws so students learn the routine before using it for dense or high-stakes content.  link

 

 

 

WHAT NOT TO DO


  • Do not decide to “do a jigsaw” at the last minute; the method requires carefully chosen chunks, clear roles, and materials.

 

  • Avoid vague directions (“teach your part to your group”) without models, guiding questions, or note‑catchers.

 

  • Do not send students straight from reading their piece into teaching their home group; they need time in expert groups to process, clarify misunderstandings, and plan how to explain.

 

  • Avoid letting expert groups work completely unmonitored.

 

  • Do not introduce the most conceptually difficult, absolutely‑must‑master content only through jigsaw; novice “experts” often miss or distort central ideas.

 

  • Avoid assuming peer explanations will match teacher clarity.

 

  • Do not randomly group students in ways that strand several struggling readers with dense text.

 

  • Avoid skipping note‑taking or active listening structures; require peers to complete organizers, ask at least one question.  link

References

Aronson, E.; Blaney, N.; Stephin, C.; Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Company

 

Aronson, E. (2000). “Jigsaw Basics” (PDF)

 

Drouet, Lentillon-Kaestner, & Marhas (2023). Effects of the Jigsaw method on student educational outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses. Frontiers in Psychology.

Fink, L.D., (2004). Beyond small groups: harnessing the extraordinary power of learning teams. In Michaelsen, L.; Knight, A.; Fink, D. (eds), Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups: Sterling, VA, Stylus Publishing.

Hattie, John (2017). “Visible Learning Effect Sizes”.

 

^ The “Jigsaw” Technique”. Education World.

 

^ “Cooperative Learning Saves the Day: One Teacher’s Story”. Education World.

 

Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31, 325-32.

 

Johnson, D.W.; Johnson, R.T.; (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.

 

Johnson, D.W.;Johnson, R. T.; Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: a meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, 60 Peik Hall, 159 Pillsbury Drive, S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning, Inc.

 

Lestik, M.; Plous, S. (2012). “Jigsaw Classroom”

 

Perplexity (2024). *Perplexity.ai* (AI chatbot). https://www.perplexity.ai/

 

Slavin, R., (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning.  Educational Leadership, 48(5), 71-82.

 

 

Jigsaw Method

 

DEFINITION

 

Jigsaw instructional method is a cooperative approach to learning. Following this method, a teacher introduces a main topic and several subtopics. Jigsaw students are broken into “home groups”, and each member of the home group is assigned a subtopic. Then, students form expert groups to study their assigned subtopic through research and discussion. After the students have mastered the subtopic in question, they return to their home group to report on their findings. At the conclusion of the exercise, each home group member has learned about each subtopic from a member of the relevant expert group or through their own investigation with an expert group.

 A cooperative learning strategy developed by Elliot Aronson (1971).  This method promotes interdependence among students, as each student’s part is essential for the completion and full understanding of the material. The Jigsaw method has been found to reduce racial conflict, promote better learning, improve student motivation, and increase enjoyment of the learning experience. It is a powerful strategy for developing community and disseminating knowledge in the classroom. link

 

DATA

  • 3 Meta Analysis reviews

  • 91 Research studies

  • 5,900 Students in studies

  • 3 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 371

 

QUOTES

“Of all the specific teaching methods studied using meta analysis, Jigsaw has the highest effect size.” Hattie (2023) p. 387

 

 

 

“The jigsaw method ensures that all students have the knowledge, the subject matter vocabulary, and the main ideas, before venturing to link their ideas more deeply and be able to transfer knowledge to new problems or issues — a rarity among teaching methods.” Hattie (2023) p. 387

 

 

 

“The fundamental principles in these steps are to maximize turn-taking, to have no one dominant, and to come to an agreement and not necessarily a consensus. All participants must have the opportunity to be heard, to ask questions, challenge and ask for clarification; but all participants must listen to others – individual responsibility and interdependence are woven into the structure.”   Aronson (2020)

 

 

 

The jigsaw method benefits students by improving academic learning, social relationships, and responsibility for their own learning. It is also associated with reduced conflict and greater cooperation in diverse classrooms. link