Teacher Practical Guidance:

Peer & Teacher Tutoring

Category: Strategy

Rank Order

38

Effect Size

0.55

Achievement Gain %

21

How-To Strategies

Peer Tutoring Effectiveness Strategies Resource link

  • When used to reinforce existing knowledge not introduce new information

 

  • Same-age peer tutoring

 

  • Reciprocal peer tutoring link

 

  • Classwide peer tutoring

 

  • Teach-back

 

  • Cross-age peer tutoring

 

  • Training for both tutor and staff

 

  • Duration: 4 to 5 times per week for 4 to 10 weeks

 

  • Provide tools such as questioning protocols

 

Professional High Impact Tutoring Strategies:  link

  • Frequent (2 to 3 times a week) 30-minute sessions held during the school day
  • One-on-one or small group sessions with no more than 4 students

  • Professionally-trained tutors

  • A focus on relationship-building relationships by having students meet with the same tutors each session

  • High-quality materials that align with classroom content

 

 

Effective Curricula for Tutoring: 

Curriculum-Driven Programs: Successful tutoring programs align closely with the classroom curriculum, ensuring that the material covered in tutoring reinforces what students are learning in school.

 

Evidence-Based Literacy Programs: Programs like Reading Recovery focus specifically on early literacy development and have demonstrated significant improvements in reading

  • Reading Recovery
  • Read Naturally
  • Structured literacy
  • LLI
  • Wilson Reading System
  • Fast Forword

 

Mathematics Interventions: High-impact tutoring models that incorporate structured math curricula have been shown to be particularly effective, often yielding much higher gains compared to standard tutoring methods.

  • Math Recovery
  • Concrete-Representational-Abstract approach
  • Cover-copy-compare
  • Say-ask-check
  • SAGA education
  • Catapult learning
  • OnYourMark tutoring

 

  • Adaptive Learning Technologies: Incorporating technology that adjusts to student performance can enhance the effectiveness of tutoring programs. For example, platforms that provide personalized feedback based on student responses can help target specific areas of need.

 

  • Frequent Assessment and Feedback: Regular assessments allow tutors to monitor progress and adjust instruction accordingly,

References

Bowman-Perrott, L., Burke, M. D., Zhang, N., & Zaini, S. (2014). Direct and collateral effects of peer tutoring on social and behavioral outcomes: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 43(3), 260–285.

 

Chase, C., Chin, D., Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 18(4), 334–352.

 

Cohen, P., et. al. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19. 237-248.

 

Cortes, K., Kortecamp, K., Loeb, S., & Robinson, C. (2024). A scalable approach to high-impact tutoring for young readers: Results of a randomized controlled trial. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w32039

 

IES What Works Clearinghouse (2012).  Peer Assisted Learning Strategies. Link

 

Fryer, R (2016). The Production of Human Capital in Developed Countries: Evidence from 196 Randomized Field Experiments. NBER. link

 

Koh, A., et.al. (2018). The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32 (3). 401-410.

 

Leung, K., et. al. (2019). An updated meta-analysis on the effects of peer tutoring on tutors achievement. School Psychology International, 40 (2). 200-214.

 

National Student Support Accelerator (2023) Tutoring: Overview of the Field. link

 

Nickow, A. J., Oreopoulos, P., & Quan, V. (2020). The impressive effects of tutoring on prek-12 learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. EdWorkingPapers.Com. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26300/eh0c-pc52

 

Robinson, C., Kraft, M., Loeb, S., & Schueler, B. (2021). Accelerating student learning with high-dosage tutoring. EdResearch for Recovery. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED613847.pdf

 

Wang, R. E., Zhang, Q., Robinson, C., Loeb, S., & Demszky, D. (2023). Step-by-step remediation of students’ mathematical mistakes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10648. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.10648

Peer & Teacher Tutoring

DEFINITIONS

Peer Tutoring:  is an educational approach where students support each other’s learning, typically in pairs or small groups. This method can take various forms, including fixed-role tutoring, where one student (the tutor) helps another (the tutee), and reciprocal tutoring, where students alternate roles. The core idea is that learners take responsibility for teaching and assessing their peers’ understanding of the material.

 

Peer Tutoring Benefits:

  • academic gains

  • fosters social skills

  • enhances self-confidence

  • improves motivation among students

  • collaboration and communication skills

  • creates a supportive learning environment where students feel more comfortable asking questions compared to traditional classroom settings

Peer Tutoring Challenges:

  • the need for careful planning and organization by educators

  • can be reluctance among some students to take on tutoring roles

  • inappropriate behavior during sessions can undermine the effectiveness of the program

 

 

Professional (Teacher) Tutoring:

Tutoring is a structured academic support service designed to help students enhance their understanding of subjects and improve their overall educational performance. It typically involves personalized instruction, often in one-on-one or small group settings, allowing tutors to tailor their teaching methods to meet individual learning needs. This supplemental assistance can take various forms, including in-person or virtual sessions, and may focus on specific subjects or broader academic skills. When conducted by a teacher, there is much greater impact for students vs. adjunct aide.

 

Professional Tutoring Benefits:

  • Personalized Learning: Tutoring provides individualized attention that is often lacking in traditional classroom settings.

  • Pace: This tailored approach helps identify and address specific learning challenges, allowing students to progress at their own pace.

  • Academic Improvement: Research indicates that students who participate in tutoring programs generally experience substantial gains in academic performance.

  • Confidence and Motivation: Beyond academic gains, tutoring can enhance students’ confidence and motivation. The personalized support fosters a positive learning environment where students feel safe to ask questions and engage deeply with the material.

  • Mitigating Learning Loss: Tutoring has also been highlighted as a crucial tool in addressing learning loss, particularly during periods of extended school closures or breaks.

DATA

  • 20 meta-analysis reviews

  • 930 research studies

  • 81,000 students in studies

Hattie (2023) p. 350

QUOTES

“Not all tutoring is the same, and not all tutoring is effective. A tutor’s goal should be to deliver high-quality instruction which not only improves their students’ comprehension of the subject matter at hand, but also empowers them with the vital underlying learning and life skills so that the students can continue to succeed once tutoring is complete. Rather than being a crutch, a quality tutor is more of a coach, guiding their student on the path of learning.” link

 

A 2016 review of nearly 200 studies found that high-impact tutoring, when provided more than three days per week or at least 50 hours over 36 weeks, produced significant, positive effects on students’ math and reading outcomes.2 Many other studies have reached comparable conclusions. link

 

 

The findings overall suggest that one-on-one high dosage tutoring with research-proven instruction can increase the growth rates of low-ability students. Although treatment and control students have statistically indistinguishable growth rates in the follow-up year, the large impact on reading scores from one year of treatment remains. link