Teacher Practical Guidance:

Poverty (Low Family SES)

Category: External

Rank Order

94

Effect Size

-0.12

Achievement Gain %

-4

How-To Strategies

CHALLENGES


  • Students from low-SES backgrounds often arrive with weaker early literacy, language, and numeracy skills.

 

  • Limited access to books, technology, enrichment, and quiet study space.

 

  • Chronic stress from housing instability, food insecurity, or family issues can impair attention, working memory, and self-regulation.

 

  • Low-SES students are more likely to exhibit inattention, disinterest, and conduct problems in school, often linked to stress, unmet needs, or unidentified learning difficulties.

 

  • Poor or inconsistent attendance is more common due to transportation issues, caregiving responsibilities, or health concerns.

 

  • Families may have less time, flexibility, or familiarity with school norms.

 

  • Students may shoulder adult responsibilities.

 

  • Schools serving low-SES communities are more likely to experience larger class sizes, fewer support staff, and inadequate materials and facilities.

 

  • High-poverty schools often have higher staff turnover and fewer experienced teachers.

 

  • Underfunding and accountability pressures can push schools toward narrow test prep.

 

  • Teachers must differentiate more intensively to address wide skill gaps while also teaching grade-level standards.

 

  • Educators must constantly guard against deficit thinking and low expectations while still realistically addressing barriers. link

 

 

HOW TO  (Raising Student Achievement in Students from low SES)


  • Early childhood education

 

  • Use of Evidence-based approaches.

 

  • High dosage tutoring.

 

  • Parental Involvement and training.

 

  • Supportive Learning environments.

 

  • Access to Enrichment opportunities.

 

  • Community Partnerships.  link

 

 

WHAT NOT TO DO


  • Do not adopt a deficit mindset (assuming low-SES students or families “don’t care,” “can’t learn,” or are the main problem).

 

  • Do not lower academic expectations, “water down” curriculum, or only teach the basics.

 

  • Do not blame students or families for systemic barriers (work schedules, housing, transportation).

 

  • Do not rely mainly on top‑down lecture, worksheet drill, or passive seat work.

 

  • Do not strip out arts, music, PE, projects, and enrichment “to focus on basics.”

 

  • Do not leave students to “teach themselves” online or in packets without strong modeling, guided practice, and frequent feedback.

 

  • Do not manage the room through fear, sarcasm, or public shaming; high‑poverty students already experience high stress, and punitive climates worsen behavior and achievement.

 

  • Do not interpret all misbehavior as “disrespect” rather than stress, lagging skills, or survival strategies.

 

  • Do not talk about students or families in deficit‑laden ways in front of colleagues or students.

 

  • Do not assume low family engagement equals low value on education.

 

References

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The Sequel. Routledge Press.

 

Sornson, B. (2023). Over-tested and under-prepared: Shifting from a one-size fits-all instruction to personalized competency based learning. Routledge Press

 

Sornson, B. (2018). Brainless sameness: The demise of one-size-fits-all instruction and the rise of competency based learning. Rowan & Littlefield.

 Poverty (Low Family SES)

DEFINITIONS

Relates to the family or household relative position in the social hierarchy based on income.

 

DATA

  • 12 Meta-analysis reviews

  • 800 Research studies

  • 1 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 116

 

 

QUOTES

“The major aim of schooling should be to mess with the predictability of who succeeds and who fails.  History, zip codes, and IQ tests should not be the determination of success.  Indeed the essence of equity involves removing the predictability  of success or failure.” Hattie, p. 67 (2023) 

 

 

“Resources, however, buy opportunities, and the effects from socioeconomic resources are more likely influential during the preschool and early years of schooling. The lack of language exposure, the lower levels of parental involvement in teaching and schooling, the fewer facilities to realize higher expectations and encouragement, and the lack of knowledge about the languge of learning may mean students from lower SES groups start the schooling process well behind others.” Hattie, p. 129 (2029)

 

 

“Well-resourced parents can provide ‘codes of speech’ that allow their children greater access to school resources, have higher expectations for current and future opportunities to extend their children, engage them in after-school activities that complement their schooling, and provide richer resources in the home to enhance learning opportunities. …Schooling introduces a language and set of cultural norms with which many parents, particularly those from lower SES families are not familiar”  Sirin (2005)

 

 

Either there can be efforts to reduce the barriers between school and home, or the effects of the home on student learning can be compromised as the child is asked to work in two worlds – the world and language at home, and the world and language of schools. For many children, this is asking too much.

It is also difficult for children in these two worlds to build a reputation as a learner, learn how to seek help in learning, and have a high level of openness to learning experiences.  It’s a compound issues when the child from lower-resourced family is asked to learn to live and work in classes with peers from middle and higher resourced families…” Hattie, p. 129 (2023)

 

 

 

“Unless we redesign our schools, poverty will increasingly beget learning failure and more poverty.  Without skills that matter to employers, most poor children are doomed to economic and social hardship. Without rock-solid learning skills and social skills, a vast majority of poor children face poverty for life.” Sornson (2023) p. 38